implicated relationship

基本解釋

There are different ideas about how to determine the implicative relationship between the several independent criminal acts of an implicated offender.
如何認(rèn)定牽連犯數(shù)個(gè)獨(dú)立的犯罪行為之間的牽連關(guān)系，存在不同觀點(diǎn)，其中折衷說(shuō)較為科學(xué)，即應(yīng)從主客觀兩方面去分析、認(rèn)定。
To decide whether acts committed have an implicated relationship, a judge should consider both subjective and objective factors, and the facts of specific cases.
判斷牽連關(guān)系，應(yīng)堅(jiān)持主客觀相統(tǒng)一原則，并由法官結(jié)合具體案情判定。
Implicated Offense has some characteristics in its subjective and objective aspects. As the essence of Implicated Offense, Implicative Relationship embodies in the characteristics.
牽連犯的特征表現(xiàn)為主、客觀兩個(gè)方面，這些特征體現(xiàn)了牽連犯的本質(zhì)——牽連關(guān)系。

牽連關(guān)系
This article firstly analyses several basic issues of implicated offense, including history, concept, character, implicated relationship and the distinctions between implicated offense and other similar offenses.
本文首先分析了牽連犯的歷史沿革、概念、基本特征、牽連關(guān)系及其與其他罪數(shù)形態(tài)的比較等基本問(wèn)題。