substantial justice

基本解釋

As a remedy for such limitation, judicial discretion becomes a must in the process of achieving substantial justice.
因此，作為法律局限性的補充和救濟(jì)，為實現(xiàn)實質(zhì)正義，法官自由裁量權(quán)就為司法過程之必須。
Incidental appeal system conduces to impartially protecting the parties benefit , preventing law' delay and realizing substantial justice to a great extent.
附帶上訴制度有助于公平地保護(hù)雙方當(dāng)事人的利益，防止訴訟拖延，最大程度地實現(xiàn)實體上的公平。
The retrial process is established in order to correct mistake judgment, achieve substantial justice and eliminate res trial of the original judgment and make a new judgment.
為糾正已生效的錯誤裁判，實現(xiàn)實體正義，需要設(shè)置審判監(jiān)督程序，消滅原裁判的既判力，并重新確定新裁判；

實質(zhì)正義
Analyze the legal basis that the judge interpretation theory was based on, such as promotes the realization of the substantial justice; avoid surprise attack of judgment, etc.
分析了釋明權(quán)制度得以確立的法理基礎(chǔ),即能夠適度地對當(dāng)事人主義進(jìn)行補充和修正,促進(jìn)實質(zhì)正義的實現(xiàn),緩和當(dāng)事人的失權(quán)負(fù)擔(dān),給當(dāng)事人以程序保障以及增加法官與當(dāng)事人之間的溝通,防止突襲性裁判的出現(xiàn)等等。
實體正義
Consequently the article focuses on the way to enhance the subjective and objective proof ability of the parties and maximize the substantial justice.
本文的思路:在正當(dāng)程序的指引下,如何補強當(dāng)事人的主客觀取證能力,最大化的實現(xiàn)實體正義。
實體公正
According to such a theory, we need balance the final judgments and substantial justice to rebuild our system of retrial .
依照該理論,重構(gòu)我國民事再審啟動機(jī)制應(yīng)當(dāng)在維護(hù)判決的終局性和實體公正之間進(jìn)行協(xié)調(diào)與平衡。
實質(zhì)公正